top of page

art entrepreneur

Prep Time:

Arts entrepreneurship actively incorporates business and entrepreneurial skills as a core part of artistic training, while traditional programs focus more exclusively on artistic technique
Arts entrepreneurship emphasizes self-management and creating one's own opportunities, while traditional paths point towards conventional employment
Arts entrepreneurship assumes a more dynamic and self-directed career path compared to the more stable trajectory assumed in traditional training
Arts entrepreneurship curriculum and best practices are still emerging and evolving, while traditional arts education models are well-established

So in essence, arts entrepreneurship represents a philosophical shift that seeks to disrupt and expand conventional notions of arts education and artistic careers to better equip artists to forge their own paths and make a living in today's creative economy. It is still a nascent field building its own models, distinct from but complementary to traditional arts education.

Cook Time:

Beckman, G. D. and Essig, L. (2012). Arts entrepreneurship: a conversation. Artivate, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1353/artv.2012.0000

Elias, S. R. S. T. A., Chiles, T. H., Duncan, C. M., & Vultee, D. M. (2017). The aesthetics of entrepreneurship: how arts entrepreneurs and their customers co-create aesthetic value. Organization Studies, 39(2-3), 345-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617717548

Pyykkönen, M., Sokka, S., & Niiniaho, A. K. (2022). Artrepreneurs and the autonomy paradox. Cultural Trends, 32(5), 474-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2022.2082865

Serves:

Characteristics of Arts Entrepreneurship:

Blends artistic and entrepreneurial training, seeing business skills as core creative competencies
Focuses on empowering artists to actively create their own opportunities and career paths
Embraces the realities of portfolio careers, preparing artists to build sustainable livelihoods from multiple income streams
Emphasizes connecting with audiences and markets for one's artistic work
Teaches skills like networking, business planning, marketing and financial management tailored to artistic careers
Concerned with both individual artists' careers and launching arts ventures/organizations
An emerging field still building formal models and best practices

Characteristics of Traditional Arts Education:

Focuses primarily on rigorous training in an artistic discipline and its techniques
Oriented towards preparing students for conventional employment paths like orchestras, theater companies, galleries, etc.
Business skills seen as separate or tangential to artistic development
Markets and audiences engaged with more passively or seen as the domain of managers/administrators rather than the artist
More established traditions, programs and curriculum

Level:

artisan entrepreneur

About the Recipe

The Artist as Entrepreneur
Inside the movement to disrupt arts education for the 21st century

In conservatories and studio art programs across the U.S., a new paradigm is emerging that melds the creative passion of the artist with the enterprising mindset of the startup founder. Proponents call it "arts entrepreneurship" and it has a straightforward mission: equip the next generation of artists not just with technique, but with the business savvy to forge sustainable and fulfilling careers.

The seeds of this shift were planted in the late 1990s, as a handful of music schools like the Eastman School of Music began incorporating entrepreneurship and leadership training alongside traditional conservatory fare. But in recent years, arts entrepreneurship has cropped up in theater, dance, design, and visual arts departments from Arizona State University to the University of Michigan.

"We're seeing this movement gain real momentum," says Linda Essig, director of the Pave Program in Arts Entrepreneurship at Arizona State. "There's a growing recognition that if we want to set our students up for success, we need to cultivate not just their artistic technique but their entrepreneurial capacity."

The gospel of arts entrepreneurship hinges on reframing business know-how as a core creative competency. Entrepreneurship, the thinking goes, is not some innate money sense but a skill set that can be taught, honed, and applied to an artistic practice. Core concepts – identifying opportunities, leveraging networks, crafting business plans – are recast with the unique goals of a creative enterprise in mind.

It's a prospect that has raised hackles among some traditionalists, who worry that an entrepreneurial focus threatens the integrity of artistic training. "There's still some lingering skepticism," acknowledges Essig, "this sense that business and art are inherently at odds. But what we're really talking about is empowering artists to make a living and a life on their own terms."

That case for empowerment has struck a chord with a generation of arts students staring down increasingly precarious career prospects. Since the culture wars of the 1980s, public funding for the arts has atrophied, even as waves of new arts graduates saturate the job market. For young creatives coming of age in this environment, an entrepreneurial skillset offers both a practical necessity and a form of self-determination.

"Artists today need to be the CEOs of their own careers," says Angela Myles Beeching, author of Beyond Talent: Creating a Successful Career in Music. "That means taking an active, entrepreneurial approach – seeking out opportunities, connecting with audiences, piecing together a viable living."

This mindset shift isn't confined to the classroom. Nationwide, artist-serving organizations are cropping up to provide business training and professional development to working artists. From Creative Capital's renowned artist workshops to Springboard for the Arts' growing roster of entrepreneurial resources, the movement to nurture artists' business acumen is rapidly gaining steam.

Still, even advocates concede that no amount of entrepreneurial preparation can negate the profound, material challenges of sustaining an artistic practice today. And some argue that saddling artists with the burden of running a small enterprise is a raw deal – a stopgap to make up for society's anemic support for the arts.

"In an ideal world, we wouldn't need to put the onus on artists to be entrepreneurs," says Essig. "We'd have robust public funding and an ecosystem that supports the arts as a public good. But given the realities we're working with, I believe this kind of training creates real opportunity for artists to build viable careers and make an impact on their own terms."

As graduates of the nation's first arts entrepreneurship programs begin to chart their paths, the impact of this nascent field is still taking shape. But one thing is certain: in a world where the very definition of an artistic career is in flux, the artist-entrepreneur is poised to take center stage.

Ingredients

These traits distinguish artrepreneurs from "pure" artists on one hand and conventional entrepreneurs on the other. Some key differences:

  • While traditional artists often work in relative solitude and engage audiences only post-creation, artrepreneurs tend to involve customers/users throughout the creative process.

  • Whereas conventional entrepreneurs are primarily motivated by commercial imperatives, artrepreneurs seek to balance cultural and financial values, often privileging aesthetic over pecuniary concerns.

  • If artists traditionally emphasize individual autonomy and entrepreneurs prioritize responsiveness to market demands, artrepreneurs inhabit a middle ground - prizing both self-direction and collaborative attunement.

At the same time, scholars note that hard boundaries are increasingly elusive. Many artrepreneurs also periodically inhabit more conventional artist or entrepreneur identities. More broadly, trends like the "aestheticization" of the economy and the democratization of creative tools are blurring the line between cultural production and economic activity writ large.

For some, this heralds an era where "we are all artrepreneurs now." For others, it threatens the distinctiveness - and thus the disruptive potential - of alternative ways of creating and coming together. Underlying the debate is an intuition that the figure of the artrepreneur captures something essential about the changing nature of creative agency and collaboration in an age of flux. Making sense of that shift, and equipping tomorrow's creatives to dance nimbly through an ever-shifting landscape, remains an urgent challenge - for practitioners and pedagogues alike.

Preparation

The Artrepreneur's Dance Exploring the Collaborative Choreography of Aesthetic Value Creation

Tucked away in studios, workshops and makerspaces around the globe, a new creative class is quietly redefining the relationship between art and enterprise. Call them artrepreneurs—that inspired cohort of boundary-crossing creatives equally at home in the realms of artistic expression and business innovation. For these versatile makers, the studio and the market are less separate spheres than a single seamless space of opportunity. Art, for the artrepreneur, is both a passion to pursue and a product to position.


Yet as a growing body of research suggests, the artrepreneur's most essential collaborator in this process is not the suits in the boardroom or even the collectors at the gallery opening. It is the humble customer—that unsung co-creator whose insight and imagination are the secret sauce in every successful aesthetic enterprise.


Take the case of classical guitar maker Sasha Radicic, whose painstaking craft is the subject of a recent ethnographic study on arts entrepreneurship. For every bespoke instrument Radicic delivers, there are countless hours spent not just in solitary toil at the workbench, but in deep dialogue with the client who commissioned it—poring over wood samples together, conjuring a shared vocabulary to describe the desired sound, and playfully exploring design possibilities through sketch and gesture.

This subtle dance, the study finds, is more than mere customer service; it is a relational process fundamental to how aesthetic value comes into being. Through a delicate interplay of "imagining, contemplating, and consensus-building," artisan and patron jointly shape the meaning and significance of the work-to-be. The resulting artifact embodies that collaborative journey—and captures value that neither party could create alone.


While Radicic's workshop may represent the artrepreneur's dance in its most intimate and bespoke expression, the underlying choreography of aesthetic co-creation is increasingly ubiquitous. Across fields as diverse as theater and graphic design, independent creatives are discovering the power of bringing customers inside the creative process early and often. The tools of the trade vary—from digital storytelling platforms that invite audiences to shape a drama's narrative arc, to participatory design frameworks that engage end-users in reimagining everyday objects and experiences. But the underlying ethos is the same: art as an intrinsically social act, animated by lively exchange between maker and public.


For the artrepreneur, this pivot to collaboration is both a pragmatic necessity and an idealistic stance. In a hyper-saturated culture market, actively enlisting customers as co-creators can be a key differentiator—the "lean startup" approach transplanted to the art world. Artrepreneurs who pull it off are often rewarded with fiercely loyal fan communities and more resilient business models.

But as a growing chorus of voices argues, the artrepreneur's dance is also a quietly radical bid to reclaim art-making as a relational act in an age of commodification. In a world where creative work is increasingly valued solely for its ROI, cultivating authentic exchange and shared meaning-making with stakeholders is a subversive move. It affirms that communities can be more than passive consumers; that they have the potential—and the right—to be active agents in shaping culture.

Of course, none of this is to suggest that the lone aesthetic genius is obsolete, or that all art must now be crowdsourced. The artrepreneur's way is less a prescriptive model than an emergent alternative, still very much in flux. And many artrepreneurs continue to engage in more traditional forms of sole-authored creative expression alongside their experiments with co-creation.


But at a moment when the narratives of the "creative economy" seem increasingly threadbare—when "gig" is more likely to evoke precarity than freedom for young creatives—the artrepreneur's path may point the way to a more humane and collaborative future. One where the communities once known as "audiences" are invited onto the stage, as partners in the unfolding improvisational performance of aesthetic value creation. The artrepreneur's dance, it turns out, may have room for all of us.

bottom of page